Comparing Possible Solutions
Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints
Entire curriculum
1858 concepts · 9 subjects
Share and support
Compare teaching approaches
Teaching approaches
Gakuva’s recommended starting approach is selected. You can still compare every option.
1 approach
Several ideas may meet a need. Compare each with the same criteria and constraints. Likely means a prediction, not a measured result. If evidence is missing, uncertain is a better rating than an invented pass. Safety: Paper planning only; no actual cutting or fastening tools. Stop: End with one selected proposal. Do not silently turn predicted ratings into test results.
Materials: Paper, pencil and ruler; One reused sheet available to inspect; no construction required 1. Use this defined problem: keep one wooden pencil from rolling on a flat desk. Criteria: fits inside a 15 cm by 15 cm footprint and blocks sideways rolling. Constraints: one reused sheet, no tape, no cutting, no extra objects. 2. Generate three different sketches. If stuck, use these teaching seeds and change a feature: folded channel with raised sides; folded sleeve around the pencil; low accordion trough. Draw where the pencil rests in each and label your change. 3. Make a table Idea | Blocks rolling? | Fits? | One sheet? | No tape/cutting? Record likely yes, likely no or uncertain for each. Estimate dimensions from the available sheet and label estimates. 4. For every rating, point to a feature in the sketch or a stated material limit. Do not give a high score just because a design looks attractive. A solution that violates a constraint cannot be selected unchanged. 5. Select one promising design and explain two criterion-based reasons. Name one uncertainty a future prototype test should check. You are selecting a proposal today, not announcing a tested winner. Done: Three distinct proposals have ratings for every criterion and constraint, with a reasoned selection and a stated uncertainty. Proof: Keep all sketches and the comparison table. Note supplied seed use and adult suggestions. Stop: End with one selected proposal. Do not silently turn predicted ratings into test results.
Family records and proof options
Keep a record of your learning
Save photos, notes, and attendance. Export a proof packet for compliance or portfolio reviews.
Learning resources
Extra practice links — they do not replace Gakuva’s teaching approach.
US EPA · Practice link — not the full lesson
Students
Before you open · source notes
Students supports Comparing Possible Solutions. An adult previews and guides; this is a learning page, not a scored quiz.
Free educational page, no sign-in required for the tested path.
Before you openAsk the learner one fact they learned and one question they still have.
Opening this link does not save learning or assess mastery.
Source, access and review notes
Public US EPA page. An anonymous GET on 2026-11-12 returned HTTP 200 with no login or payment prompt for this URL. Opening the link does not save practice or assess mastery. An adult should preview and guide the learner.
US EPA. “Students.” External page; Gakuva does not copy, host, embed, or redistribute materials.
Unknown — link only
Check understanding
- Generate at least three possible solutions to a defined design problem
- Compare solutions against the specified criteria and constraints
- Select the most promising solution with reasoning for the choice
“Can your child brainstorm several different solutions to a design challenge and then compare them to decide which one best meets the requirements?”
Curriculum record
- Type
- Procedural
- Subject
- Science
- Domain
- Scientific Inquiry
- Age range
- Ages 8–12
Standards